Saturday, September 21, 2019

Bicycles And The Junior Anti-sex League


From a Facebook post. Short, but important enough to re-post here.

https://quillette.com/2019/09/10/in-praise-of-renoirs-male-gaze/

Me: It has come to this? A female scholar must defend Renoir against the anti-sex, anti-male attacks of radical feminism. How sad.

B: Quillette is a magazine I've come to really appreciate right now. They've become the center of cultural controversy: they are routinely castigated as a fascist mag. It's bizarre. The CEO is Claire Lehmann; she's a smart thinker who seems to love jumping into the vitriolic fray of social commentary.

Me: They do tend to have too much of a conservative slant for me to enthusiastically support them, but they often make excellent points. I do notice that if you disagree with them on even minor matters it’s common for you to be instantly labeled a Marxist. Not all the contributors practice this unusual ritual, but too many of them do.

For any of you out there asking, the Junior Anti-sex League??? I include The following link and quote.

> The Junior Anti-Sex League in 1984 is a group that advocates "complete celibacy for both sexes." They are pushing the agenda of the Party, the group that rules the country. According to the Junior Anti-Sex League, children should not be conceived through sexual intercourse. <

https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-junior-anti-sex-league-1089836

Or, put another way, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” Oh sorry, that’s not an accurate quote. Let me correct that, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a mate.”

1 comment:

  1. Although I just published this a few minutes ago, I bumped into another article which does lend some support to the Junior Anti-sex League/radical feminists.
    https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/monosex-animal-populations-could-help-prevent-disease-and-poverty?utm_source=Cosmos+-+Master+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=0ccbdef7ea-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3f5c04479a-0ccbdef7ea-180555153

    Of course, this particular use of mono sex groups is for the production of food animals. Somehow I doubt that will bother the radical feminists very much.

    ReplyDelete